4.4 Article

Consumption of caffeinated coffee and a high carbohydrate meal affects postprandial metabolism of a subsequent oral glucose tolerance test in young, healthy males

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 103, 期 6, 页码 833-841

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114509992406

关键词

Coffee; Caffeine; Insulin sensitivity; Oral glucose tolerance test

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Caffeine and caffeinated coffee (CC) elicit acute insulin insensitivity when ingested before a carbohydrate load. The effects of CC on glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity when co-ingested with a high carbohydrate meal and on postprandial metabolism of a subsequent (second) carbohydrate load have not been studied. In a randomised, crossover design, ten healthy males ingested either CC (5 mg caffeine/kg body weight), decaffeinated coffee (DC) or water (W; equal volume) co-ingested with a high glycaemic index cereal followed 3 h later by a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test. After the initial meal, insulin area under the curve (AUC) and insulin sensitivity index did not differ between treatments, although glucose AUC for CC (107 (SEM 18) mmol/l x 3 h) and DC (74 (SEM 15) mmol/l X 3 h) was greater than W (-0.2 (SEM 29) mmol/l X 3 h, P<0.05). After the second carbohydrate load, insulin AUC for CC was 49% and 57% greater (P<0.01) than for DC and W, respectively. Despite the greater insulin response, glucose AUC for CC (217 (SEM 24) mmol/l x 2 h) was greater than both DC (126 (SEM 11) mmol/l x 2 h, P=0.01) and W (55 (SEM 34) mmol/l x 2h, P<0.001). Insulin sensitivity index after the second meal was lower after CC (8.2 (SEM 0.9)) compared with both DC (12.4 (SEM 1.2), P<0.01) and W (13.4 (SEM 1.4), P<0.001). Co-ingestion of CC with one meal resulted in insulin insensitivity during the postprandial phase of a second meal in the absence of further CC ingestion. Thus, CC may play a role in daily glycaemic management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据