4.6 Article

Effects of mitochondrial ferritin overexpression in normal and sideroblastic erythroid progenitors

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 161, 期 5, 页码 726-737

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12316

关键词

mitochondrial ferritin; myelodysplastic syndrome; ring sideroblasts; erythroid progenitors; lentiviral transduction

资金

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
  2. Fondazione Cariplo
  3. Ministry for Education, University and Research, Italy
  4. Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts (MDS-RS), the iron deposited in the mitochondria of RS is present in the form of mitochondrial ferritin (FTMT), but it is unknown whether FTMT overexpression is the cause or the result of mitochondrial iron deposition. Lentivirus FTMT-transduced CD34+ bone marrow cells from seven healthy donors and CD34+ cells from 24 patients with MDS-RS were cultured according to a procedure that allowed the expansion of high numbers of erythroid progenitors. These cells were used to investigate the possible influence of experimentally-induced FTMT overexpression on normal erythropoiesis and the functional effects of FTMT in sideroblastic erythropoiesis. In MDS-RS progenitors, FTMT overexpression was associated with reduced cytosolic ferritin levels, increased surface transferrin receptor expression and reduced cell proliferation; FTMT effects were independent of SF3B1 mutation status. Similarly, FTMT overexpressing normal erythroid progenitors were characterized by reduced cytosolic ferritin content and increased CD71 expression, and also by higher apoptotic rate in comparison with the FTMT- controls. Significantly lower levels of STAT5 phosphorylation following erythropoietin stimulation were found in both sideroblastic and normal FTMT+ erythroid cells compared to the FTMT- cells. In conclusion, experimental overexpression of FTMT may modify mitochondrial iron availability and lead to ineffective erythropoiesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据