4.6 Article

Pre-emptive rituximab based on viraemia and T cell reconstitution: a highly effective strategy for the prevention of Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoproliferative disease following stem cell transplantation

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 155, 期 3, 页码 377-385

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08855.x

关键词

stem cell transplantation; T cell depletion; lymphoproliferative disease; Rituximab; Epstein-Barr virus

资金

  1. National Institute of Health Research (NIHR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the efficacy of a pre-emptive strategy based on the combination of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viraemia and poor T cell reconstitution in preventing post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) following T cell depleted stem cell transplant (SCT). EBV viral load and immune reconstitution were prospectively monitored in 70 consecutive children undergoing SCT following reduced intensity conditioning with alemtuzumab. Patients who developed significant EBV viraemia (>40 000 copies/ml blood) were treated pre-emptively with rituximab if they were within 3 months of SCT or their CD3 count was <0.3 x 10(9)/l. Of 20/70 patients who developed significant EBV viraemia, 13 received pre-emptive rituximab. The incidence of PTLD was significantly reduced in the pre-emptive cohort compared to historical controls (1.4% vs. 21.7%, P = 0.003). This difference was more marked among viraemic patients (2.7% vs. 62.5% P < 0.0001). Patients treated with rituximab demonstrated significantly delayed B cell reconstitution at 1 year post-SCT but this was not associated with an increase in infectious mortality. In 6/6 patients >3 months post-SCT who had a CD3 count >0.3 x 10(9)/l, reduced immunosuppression only resulted in successful resolution of EBV viraemia without PTLD. This strategy is safe and highly effective in preventing PTLD following T cell depleted SCT, and directs rituximab therapy to patients at highest risk of this complication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据