4.6 Article

Effects on fibrin network porosity of anticoagulants with different modes of action and reversal by activated coagulation factor concentrate*

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 152, 期 6, 页码 758-765

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08546.x

关键词

warfarin; thrombin-inhibitors; Xa-inhibitors; fibrin-network; FEIBA

资金

  1. AstraZeneca, Molndal, Sweden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>Orally available direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) and direct activated factor X inhibitors (DFXaI) may replace vitamin K antagonists in patients needing long-term anticoagulant treatment. We investigated the influence on the fibrin network of anticoagulants with different modes of action: AR-H067637 (DTI), the active metabolite of AZD0837, apixaban (DFXaI), fondaparinux (indirect FXaI) and warfarin. Counteraction of the anticoagulant effect by FEIBA (R) (Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypass Activity) was also investigated. Tissue factor, phospholipids and calcium were used to initiate coagulation in human platelet poor plasma. The permeability constant (Ks), reflecting the amount of buffer passing through the coagulum, was calculated and the fibrin network was visualized by 3D confocal microscopy. Warfarin (International Normalized Ratio 2-3) increased Ks in plasma by 28-50% compared with control. 'Therapeutic' plasma concentrations of AR-H067637 (0 center dot 3-0 center dot 6 mu mol/l), apixaban (0 center dot 2-0 center dot 4 mu mol/l) and fondaparinux (0 center dot 1-0 center dot 3 mu mol/l) increased Ks by 72-91%, 58-76% and 36-53% respectively. Addition of FEIBA (R) totally reversed the warfarin effect but only partially reversed effects of the other anticoagulants at concentrations that increased Ks by 50% or more. Fibrin network observed with 3D confocal microscopy agreed well with the permeability results. In conclusion, all examined anticoagulants rendered the fibrin network more porous. FEIBA (R) reversed the increased permeability in warfarin plasma but had only partial effects on the other anticoagulants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据