Effectiveness of reminder strategies on cancer screening adherence: a randomised controlled trial
出版年份 2018 全文链接
标题
Effectiveness of reminder strategies on cancer screening adherence: a randomised controlled trial
作者
关键词
-
出版物
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
Volume 68, Issue 674, Pages e604-e611
出版商
Royal College of General Practitioners
发表日期
2018-08-14
DOI
10.3399/bjgp18x698369
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Is an opportunistic primary care-based intervention for non-responders to bowel screening feasible and acceptable? A mixed-methods feasibility study in Scotland
- (2017) Natalia Calanzani et al. BMJ Open
- Association of Interactive Reminders and Automated Messages With Persistent Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening
- (2017) Martin C. S. Wong et al. JAMA Oncology
- Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- (2016) et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Optimising colorectal cancer screening acceptance: a review
- (2015) Carlo Senore et al. GUT
- Invitation strategies for colorectal cancer screening programmes: The impact of an advance notification letter
- (2015) Carlo Senore et al. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Predictors of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia for Colorectal Cancer Screening
- (2014) Martin C.S. Wong et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Understanding Current Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States
- (2014) David T. Liss et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- An updated Asia Pacific Consensus Recommendations on colorectal cancer screening
- (2014) J J Y Sung et al. GUT
- Increasing participation in colorectal cancer screening: Results from a cluster randomized trial of directly mailed gFOBT kits to previous nonresponders
- (2014) Jill Tinmouth et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Use of Interactive Voice Response to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening
- (2014) Hannah Cohen-Cline et al. MEDICAL CARE
- Comparative Effectiveness of a Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Adherence to Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers
- (2014) David W. Baker et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- A validated tool to predict colorectal neoplasia and inform screening choice for asymptomatic subjects
- (2013) Martin C S Wong et al. GUT
- Preformulated implementation intentions to promote colorectal cancer screening: A cluster-randomized trial.
- (2013) Siu Hing Lo et al. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
- Prospective cohort study of compliance with faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in Hong Kong
- (2013) Martin C.S. Wong et al. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Population-based screening for colorectal cancer using an immunochemical faecal occult blood test: A comparison of two invitation strategies
- (2012) Sofie Van Roosbroeck et al. Cancer Epidemiology
- A feces collection paper does not enhance participation in a fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program
- (2012) Maaike J. Denters et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION
- Primary care endorsement letter and a patient leaflet to improve participation in colorectal cancer screening: results of a factorial randomised trial
- (2011) P Hewitson et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Direct mailing of faecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening: a randomized population study from Central Italy
- (2011) Paolo Giorgi Rossi et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING
- Pre-notification Increases Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening in All Demographic Groups: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- (2011) Gillian Libby et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING
- Advance notification letters increase adherence in colorectal cancer screening: A population-based randomized trial
- (2011) A.H.C. van Roon et al. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Uptake of colorectal cancer screening: system, provider and individual factors and strategies to improve participation
- (2009) Emily Power et al. Future Oncology
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started