4.4 Article

Factors associated with duration of new antidepressant treatment: analysis of a large primary care database

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
卷 62, 期 595, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL COLL GENERAL PRACTITIONERS
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp12X625166

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chief Scientist Office Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background It is not known howmuch the duration of newly prescribed antidepressant treatment is influenced by patient characteristics or practice variation. Aim To describe the relationship between patient characteristics and the duration of new antidepressant treatment by general practices. Design and setting Large primary care database cohort study of all patients with a newly initiated course of eligible antidepressant treatment during 1 year, froma database of 237 Scottish practices. Method Detailed prescription data were used to estimate the duration of new antidepressant treatment for each patient. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the influence of patient characteristics on continuation of treatment and, bymultilevelmodelling, the variation between practices. Results A total of 28 027 (2.2%) patients commenced antidepressant treatment during the year; 75% continued beyond 30 days, 56%beyond 90 days, and 40%beyond 180 days. Treatment was less likely to be continued in patients fromareas of high socioeconomic deprivation: hazard ratio 1.22 (95%confidence interval [CI] = 1.16 to 1.29); in patients under 35 years, 1.33 (95%CI = 1.28 to 1.37); and in those for whomthe GP recorded no relevant diagnostic code, 1.16 (95%CI = 1.13 to 1.18).Models accounted for between 2.2%and 3.9%of the variation in treatment duration. Conclusion Patient demographic characteristics account for relatively little variation in the duration of new antidepressant treatment, though treatment was shorter in younger patients and those with greater socioeconomic deprivation. There is variation in treatment duration between practices and according to whether patients have a depression diagnosis coded in their records.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据