4.6 Article

RAS and RAF mutations in banal melanocytic aggregates contiguous with primary cutaneous melanoma: clues to melanomagenesis

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
卷 160, 期 2, 页码 368-375

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08887.x

关键词

banal naevi; laser capture microdissection; malignant melanoma; melanocytic aggregate; oncogenes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Distinguishing banal melanocytic aggregates contiguous with malignant melanoma can be a histological challenge but is essential because of the potential for a spurious Breslow measurement. Our aim was to ascertain whether the histological distinction between the two relates to differences in the prevalence of mutations in genes significant in melanomagenesis. Mutations in BRAF codon 600, NRAS1 codons 12/13, NRAS2 codons 60/61 and KRAS codons 12/13 were ascertained in 18 cases of primary cutaneous malignant melanoma contiguous with banal melanocytic aggregates using laser capture microdissection. Overall, 12 of 18 cases (67%) exhibited a mutation in at least one gene. BRAF V600E appeared to be the most commonly mutated gene in both the melanocytic aggregate (seven of 18, 39%) and the melanoma (four of 18, 22%). Both populations demonstrated a similar BRAF genomic profile in 11 of 18 cases (61%) (two BRAF V600E, nine BRAF-WT), a similar KRAS genomic profile in 14 of 18 cases (78%) (one KRAS G12V, 13 KRAS-WT) and a similar NRAS2 genomic profile in 14 of 18 cases (all WT). Of interest, we noted a relatively high prevalence of KRAS mutations (five of 18, 28%). The frequency of KRAS mutations in the melanocytic aggregate (five of 18, 28%) was second to BRAF V600E, while in melanoma, the frequency was also second to BRAF V600E but equalled that of NRAS2 (1 of 18, 6%). No NRAS1 mutations were observed. BRAF and RAS mutations appeared to be mutually exclusive with only three of 18 cases (17%) demonstrating a mutation in both genes (melanocytic aggregate only). Our findings hint towards the interpretation of banal melanocytic aggregates serving as precursor lesions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据