4.5 Article

Assessment of the cardiac safety of prucalopride in healthy volunteers: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and positive-controlled thorough QT study

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 73, 期 2, 页码 203-209

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04088.x

关键词

5-HT4; constipation; moxifloxacin; prucalopride; safety; study specific QT correction; thorough QT study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIMS To assess steady-state effects of therapeutic and supra-therapeutic doses of prucalopride on the QT interval using a novel design involving a parallel placebo group with nested crossover for positive control. METHODS A double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-and active-controlled study was conducted in 120 healthy male and female volunteers (NCT00903747). Volunteers were randomized to receive prucalopride 2-10 mg once daily (therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses, respectively) (group 1), placebo with 400 mg moxifloxacin on day 1 (group 2a), or placebo with moxifloxacin on day 15 (group 2b). Twelve-lead 24 h Holter ECGs recorded at various time-points were evaluated blind and centrally. RESULTS Estimated mean difference in study specific corrected QT interval (QTcSS) time-matched change from baseline between prucalopride (2 and 10 mg) and placebo was < 5ms at all time points (maximum mean difference: 3.83 ms at 3.5 h post dose on day 5 with 2mg [90% Cl -0.33, 6.38 ms]). Upper limits of the two-sided 90% CI for QTcSS were all < 10 ms. There were no outlying QTcSS values > 450 ms and no subjects had an increase > 60 ms following prucalopride. Moxifloxacin produced the expected significant changes in QTcSS (> 5ms, maximum of + 12.7 ms at 5 h post dose) at all time-points except 1 h post dose. Prucalopride resulted in small increases in heart rate (maximum of 5.8 beats min(-1)), which were similar for 2 and 10 mg. Prucalopride was well tolerated after first day of treatment. CONCLUSION Prucalopride at both therapeutic and supra therapeutic doses has no clinically significant effects on cardiac repolarisation in healthy volunteers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据