4.5 Article

Dose-effect study of domperidone as a galactagogue in preterm mothers with insufficient milk supply, and its transfer into milk

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 66, 期 2, 页码 283-289

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03207.x

关键词

breastfeeding; domperidone; infant dose; insufficient milk supply; lactation; preterm infants

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIMS To investigate the possibility of a dose-response relationship for the use of domperidone in treating insufficient milk supply in mothers of preterm infants, and to quantify the exposure of the breastfed infant to domperidone. METHODS Six preterm mothers received domperidone (30 mg daily or 60 mg daily) in a double-blind, randomized, crossover trial. Milk production and serum prolactin were measured before and during the trial, and domperidone concentration in milk was measured during drug treatment. RESULTS For milk production, two of the mothers were 'nonresponders', whereas the other four were 'responders' and showed a significant increase in milk production from 8.7 +/- 3.1 g h(-1) in the run-in phase (mean +/- SEM), 23.6 +/- 3.9 g h(-1) for the 30-mg dose (P = 0.0217) and 29.4 +/- 6.6 g h(-1) for the 60-mg dose (P = 0.0047). In all participants, serum prolactin was significantly increased for both doses, but the response was not dose dependent. Median (interquartile range) domperidone concentrations in milk over a dose interval at steady-state were 0.28 mu g l(-1) (0.24-0.43) and 0.49 mu g l(-1) (0.33-0.72) for the 30-mg and 60-mg doses, respectively. The mean relative infant dose was 0.012% at 30 mg daily and 0.009% at 60 mg daily. CONCLUSION In one-third of mothers, domperidone did not increase milk production. In the remainder, milk production increased at both domperidone doses, and there was a trend for a dose-response relationship. The amount of domperidone that transfers into milk was extremely low, and infant exposure via breastfeeding was not considered to be significant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据