4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Inhibition of placental P-glycoprotein: impact on indinavir transfer to the foetus

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 65, 期 5, 页码 667-673

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03067.x

关键词

HIV protease inhibitors; indinavir; P-glycoprotein; placental transfer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIMS To investigate the effect of P-gp inhibition on the maternal to foetal transfer of indinavir. METHODS Term human placentae (n = 12) were from non-HIV infected women. Maternal to foetal transfer of indinavir was examined in the absence and presence of P-gp inhibitors PSC833 (n = 7) or ritonavir (n = 5), in the perfused human placenta. Antipyrine and [H-3]-vinblastine were included as markers of passive diffusion and P-gp transport, respectively. These markers and indinavir were added to maternal perfusate at 0 min; PSC833 or ritonavir was added at 25 min. Steady-state maternal to foetal transfer clearance was calculated during control and inhibitor phases. Indinavir and vinblastine clearances were normalized to antipyrine clearance (clearance index). RESULTS Indinavir clearance index increased between the control (0.25 +/- 0.03) and PSC833 phases (0.37 +/- 0.14) (95% CI of the difference -0.23, -0.002). Vinblastine clearance index increased from (0.25 +/- 0.08) to (0.34 +/- 0.06) in the control and PSC833 phases, respectively (95% CI of difference -0.14, -0.05). Indinavir clearance index was unchanged between control (0.34 +/- 0.14) and ritonavir phases (0.39 +/- 0.13) (95% CI of the difference -0.19, 0.08). Vinblastine clearance index increased from (0.24 +/- 0.12) to (0.32 +/- 0.12) in the control and ritonavir phases, respectively (95% CI of the difference -0.15, -0.009). CONCLUSIONS Maternal to foetal transfer clearance of indinavir and vinblastine increased following P-gp inhibition. The potential role for co-administration of P-gp inhibitors with PIs to reduce perinatal HIV transmission warrants further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据