4.7 Article

Experience of symptoms indicative of gynaecological cancers in UK women

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 109, 期 4, 页码 882-887

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.412

关键词

gynaecological cancer symptoms; help-seeking; symptom survey

类别

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK [14134] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Cancer Research UK [14134] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Gynaecological cancers account for similar to 12% of female cancer incidence in the United Kingdom. Encouraging prompt help-seeking for potential symptoms could help improve outcomes. However, before developing help-seeking interventions, it is important to estimate the number of women with symptoms potentially indicative of a gynaecological cancer to help estimate the impact of such interventions on primary care. Methods: As part of a face-to-face, population-based survey, women aged >= 16 (n = 911) were shown a list of symptoms potentially indicative of a gynaecological cancer and were asked to indicate any experienced in the last 3 months. Those who reported symptoms were asked about their responses to one randomly selected index symptom. Results: Just under half (44%) of the respondents reported a symptom, with 35% reporting a frequent and/or severe symptom. Younger (P<0.001), lower socioeconomic status (P<0.01) and non-White women (P<0.05) were significantly more likely to report symptoms. Few (14%) respondents were both older (>= 45 years) and had a frequent and/or severe symptom. Of these women, 38% had seen a GP. Conclusion: Symptoms that potentially indicate a gynaecological cancer, even if limited to those that are frequent and/or severe, appear to be common. Consequently, encouraging prompt help-seeking may increase the burden on primary care. However, targeting those at increased risk (older women with frequent or severe symptoms) should avoid unmanageable increases in primary care consultations for gynaecological conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据