4.7 Article

Increased MET and HGF gene copy numbers are associated with trastuzumab failure in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 107, 期 5, 页码 793-799

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.335

关键词

breast cancer; HER2-positive; HGF; MET

类别

资金

  1. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) [IG9425]
  2. Associazione Oncologia Traslazionale (AOT)
  3. National Cancer Institute [P30-CA46934]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether copy number gain of MET or hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) affect trastuzumab sensitivity in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: We analysed 130 HER2-positive MBC treated with trastuzumab-based therapy. MET and HGF gene copy numbers (GCN) were assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in primary breast cancer samples. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was applied to find the best cutoff point for both MET and HGF GCN. RESULTS: MET FISH-positive cases (N = 36, mean >= 3.72) had a significantly higher trastuzumab failure rate (44.4% vs 16.0%; P = 0.001) and a significantly shorter time to progression (5.7 vs 9.9 months; HR 1.74; P = 0.006) than MET FISH-negative cases (N = 94, mean < 3.72). Hepatocyte growth factor GCN was evaluated in 84 cases (64.6%). Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified 33 HGF FISH-positive patients (mean HGF GCN >= 3.01). HGF FISH-positive status was significantly associated with higher risk of failure (30.3% vs 7.8%; P = 0.007) as compared with HGF FISH-negative cases (N = 51, mean < 3.01). MET and HGF FISH-positive status was highly correlated (P < 0.001) and combination of both biomarkers did not increase predictive value of either considered separately. CONCLUSION: High GCNs of MET and HGF associate with an increased risk of trastuzumab-based therapy failure in HER2-positive MBC. British Journal of Cancer (2012) 107, 793-799. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.335 www.bjcancer.com Published online 31 July 2012 (C) 2012 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据