4.7 Article

Cetuximab-based therapy in elderly comorbid patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 106, 期 2, 页码 274-278

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.554

关键词

cetuximab; chemotherapy; metastatic colorectal cancer; elderly patients

类别

资金

  1. Merck Serono GmbH, Darmstadt (Germany)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials under-represent patients (pts) >65 years. Non-interventional studies (NISs) help to evaluate therapies in daily practice. This NIS evaluates efficacy and safety of cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) pts aged >65 years vs <= 65 years. METHODS: A total of 657 pts were recruited into the NIS and analysed applying descriptive statistics and chi(2) or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: A total of 309 and 305 pts aged <= 65 and >65 years, respectively, were documented; 80% showing a reduced ECOG status of 1-2 and 95% having received at least one palliative treatment. Cetuximab was combined with irinotecan according to approval status. Grade III/IV toxicities occurred in 20% of pts without any difference between age groups although the older pts had significantly more pre-existing comorbidities (P=0.001). A total of 64.2% of the pts developed skin rash, which was strongly related to response (P<0.0002) without any difference between age groups (P 0.34). The objective response rates were 37.9% for ages 18-65 years vs 35.4% for >65 years. Progression-free survival (PFS) did not differ between pts 18-65 years old (6.5 months) in comparison with pts >65 years (7.0 months). In a multivariate analysis only ECOG status had a negative impact on PFS (HR: 0,675; 95% Cl, 0.53-0.87; P=0.0019). CONCLUSION: This NIS reports one of the largest mCRC collectives 465 years and reduced performance status. Cetuximab has a similar efficacy and safety profile for pts aged <= 65 and >65 years. British Journal of Cancer (2012) 106, 274-278. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.554 www.bjcancer.com Published online 3 January 2012 (C) 2012 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据