4.7 Article

Bevacizumab continuation beyond initial bevacizumab progression among recurrent glioblastoma patients

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 107, 期 9, 页码 1481-1487

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.415

关键词

malignant glioma; glioblastoma; angiogenesis; bevacizumab; vascular endothelial growth factor

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [5P50-NS-20023, 5 R37 CA11898, MO1 RR 30]
  2. Genentech/Roche

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab improves outcome for most recurrent glioblastoma patients, but the duration of benefit is limited and survival after initial bevacizumab progression is poor. We evaluated bevacizumab continuation beyond initial progression among recurrent glioblastoma patients as it is a common, yet unsupported practice in some countries. METHODS: We analysed outcome among all patients (n = 99) who received subsequent therapy after progression on one of five consecutive, single-arm, phase II clinical trials evaluating bevacizumab regimens for recurrent glioblastoma. Of note, the five trials contained similar eligibility, treatment and assessment criteria, and achieved comparable outcome. RESULTS: The median overall survival (OS) and OS at 6 months for patients who continued bevacizumab therapy (n = 55) were 5.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.4, 7.6) and 49.2% (95% CI: 35.2, 61.8), compared with 4.0 months (95% CI: 2.1, 5.4) and 29.5% (95% CI: 17.0, 43.2) for patients treated with a non-bevacizumab regimen (n = 44; P = 0.014). Bevacizumab continuation was an independent predictor of improved OS (hazard ratio = 0.64; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The results of our retrospective pooled analysis suggest that bevacizumab continuation beyond initial progression modestly improves survival compared with available non-bevacizumab therapy for recurrent glioblastoma patients require evaluation in an appropriately randomised, prospective trial. British Journal of Cancer (2012) 107, 1481-1487. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.415 www.bjcancer.com Published online 4 October 2012 (C) 2012 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据