4.7 Article

Addition of GM-CSF to trastuzumab stabilises disease in trastuzumab-resistant HER2+ metastatic breast cancer patients

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 103, 期 9, 页码 1331-1334

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605918

关键词

granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; HER2; metastatic breast cancer; trastuzumab

类别

资金

  1. Bayer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: One of the proposed mechanisms of trastuzumab-induced regression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) tumours includes facilitation of antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) mediates ADCC. We presented our pilot study of adding GM-CSF to trastuzumab in patients with trastuzumab-resistant HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer that progressed after trastuzumab +/- chemotherapy were continued on trastuzumab 2mg kg(-1) intravenous weekly and GM-CSF 250 mu g m(-2) subcutaneous daily. Patients were assessed for response every 8 weeks. Treatment was continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were evaluable (median age 48 years, range 27-75 years). The median number of metastatic sites was 2 (range 1-3); the most common site was the liver (n = 10). The median number of prior regimens for metastatic disease was 2 (range 1-5). No objective disease response was observed, but five patients (29%) had stable disease for a median duration of 15.8 (range 10-53.9) weeks. The most common adverse event was rash at the injection site. No grade 4 or irreversible adverse event was seen. CONCLUSION: The addition of GM-CSF to trastuzumab alone had a modest clinical benefit and acceptable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with trastuzumab-resistant HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer (2010) 103, 1331-1334. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605918 www.bjcancer.com Published online 28 September 2010 (C) 2010 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据