4.7 Article

Pickled vegetables and the risk of oesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 101, 期 9, 页码 1641-1647

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605372

关键词

pickled vegetable; oesophageal cancer; case-control; cohort; meta-analysis

类别

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute
  2. National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Ecological and experimental studies have suggested a relationship between Asian pickled vegetable consumption and oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), but the results of epidemiological studies investigating the association have been inconsistent. We conducted a meta-analysis of observational studies of this association to evaluate the existing evidence. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, ISI-Web of Science, J-EAST, IndMed, Vip Chinese Periodical, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases for all studies published in English or Chinese languages. Pooled results for all studies combined and for several study subgroups were computed. RESULTS: A total of 34 studies were included in this analysis. The overall random effects odds ratio ( OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for pickled vegetable consumption was 2.08 (1.66-2.60), but the results were heterogeneous across studies. After excluding the three most influential studies, the respective numbers were 2.32 (1.92-2.81). Similar to the overall association, the majority of subgroup analyses showed a statistically significant association between consuming pickled vegetables and OSCC risk. There were only three prospective studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a potential two-fold increased risk of oesophageal cancer associated with the intake of pickled vegetables. However, because the majority of data was from retrospective studies and there was a high heterogeneity in the results, further well-designed prospective studies are warranted. British Journal of Cancer ( 2009) 101, 1641-1647. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605372 www.bjcancer.com (C) 2009 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据