4.7 Article

Loss of Coxsackie and adenovirus receptor downregulates α-catenin expression

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 101, 期 9, 页码 1574-1579

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605331

关键词

Coxsackie and adenovirus receptor; alpha-catenin; interaction

类别

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [An 347/3-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: The Coxsackie and adenovirus receptor ( CAR) has been shown to inhibit cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. The underlying mechanisms, however, are poorly understood. METHODS: The differential gene expression in the human colon cancer cell line DLDI on RNAi-mediated functional CAR knockdown was analysed using oligo-array technology. Expression of alpha-catenin was determined by quantitative RT-PCR and western blotting. Proliferation, migration, and invasion after CAR knockdown were assessed by in vitro assays, and cell morphology in a three-dimensional context was evaluated using matrigel. RESULTS: Oligo-array technology identified alpha-catenin as the strongest downregulated gene after CAR knockdown. Western blotting and quantitative RT-PCR confirmed a reduced alpha-catenin expression after CAR knockdown in DLD1 cells and in the rat intestinal cell line IEC-6. Functionally, both cell lines showed a marked increase in proliferation, migration, and invasion on CAR knockdown. In matrigel, both cell lines formed amorphous cell clusters in contrast to well-organised three-dimensional structures of CAR-expressing vector controls. Ectopic 're'-expression of alpha-catenin in DLDI and IEC-6 CAR knockdown cells reversed these functional and morphological effects. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that an interaction of CAR and alpha-catenin mediates the impact of CAR on cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and morphology. British Journal of Cancer ( 2009) 101, 1574-1579. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605331 www.bjcancer.com Published online 22 September 2009 (C) 2009 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据