4.7 Article

Chemokine CXCL13 is overexpressed in the tumour tissue and in the peripheral blood of breast cancer patients

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 99, 期 6, 页码 930-938

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604621

关键词

chemokines; CXCL13; breast cancer; tumour expression; serum markers

类别

资金

  1. Erich und Gertrud Roggenbuck-Stiftung
  2. Eppendorfer Krebs-und Leukamiehilfe eV
  3. Deutsche Krebshilfe
  4. Cancer Research Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The abilities of chemokines in orchestrating cellular migration are utilised by different (patho-) biological networks including malignancies. However, except for CXCR4/CXCL12, little is known about the relation between tumour-related chemokine expression and the development and progression of solid tumours like breast cancer. In this study, microarray analyses revealed the overexpression of chemokine CXCL13 in breast cancer specimens. This finding was confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction in a larger set of samples (n = 34) and cell lines, and was validated on the protein level performing Western blot, ELISA, and immunohistochemistry. Levels of CXCR5, the receptor for CXCL13, were low in malignant and healthy breast tissues, and surface expression was not detected in vitro. However, we observed a strong (P = 0.0004) correlation between the expressions of CXCL13 and CXCR5 in breast cancer tissues, indicating a biologically relevant role of CXCR5 in vivo. Finally, we detected significantly elevated serum concentrations of CXCL13 in patients with metastatic disease (n = 54) as compared with controls (n = 44) and disease-free patients (n = 48). In conclusion, CXCL13 is overexpressed within breast cancer tissues, and increased serum levels of this cytokine can be found in breast cancer patients with metastatic disease pointing to a role of CXCL13 in the progression of breast cancer, suggesting that CXCL13 might serve as a useful therapeutic target and/or diagnostic marker in this malignancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据