4.2 Article

Randomized Controlled Trial of Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation in Midwestern US Human Milk Donors

期刊

BREASTFEEDING MEDICINE
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 86-91

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2011.0126

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital
  2. National Center for Research Resources [UL1RR025755]
  3. Ohio State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is a long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid important for neonatal neurodevelopment and immune homeostasis. Preterm infants fed donor milk from a Midwestern source receive only 20% of the intrauterine accretion of DHA. We tested the hypothesis that DHA supplementation of donor mothers would provide preterm infants with DHA intake equivalent to fetal accretion. Subjects and Methods: After Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent, human milk donors to the Mother's Milk Bank of Ohio were randomized to receive 1 g of DHA (Martek (R) [now DSM Nutritional Lipids, Columbia, MD]) or placebo soy oil. Dietary intake data were collected and analyzed by a registered dietitian. Fatty acids were measured by gas chromatography/flame ionization detection. Statistical analysis used linear mixed models. Results: Twenty-one mothers were randomly assigned to either the DHA group (n = 10) or the placebo group (n = 11). Donor age was a median of 31 years in both groups with a mean lactational stage of 19 weeks. Dietary intake of DHA at baseline in both groups was a median of 23mg/day (range, 0-194mg), significantly (p < 0.0001) less than the minimum recommended intake of 200mg/day. The DHA content of milk increased in the DHA-supplemented group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The women enrolled in this study had low dietary DHA intake. Supplementation with preformed DHA at 1 g/day resulted in increased DHA concentrations in the donor milk with no adverse outcomes. Infants fed donor milk from supplemented women receive dietary DHA levels that closely mimic normal intrauterine accretion during the third trimester.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据