4.5 Article

A unique RNA-directed nucleoside analog is cytotoxic to breast cancer cells and depletes cyclin E levels

期刊

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
卷 121, 期 2, 页码 355-364

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0481-3

关键词

8-chloro-adenosine; Breast cancer; Nucleoside analog; RNA synthesis inhibition; Cyclin E

类别

资金

  1. Susan G. Komen for the Cure [KG080366]
  2. National Cancer Institute [CA85915]
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA085915] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In contrast to deoxyribose or arabinose containing nucleoside analogs that are currently established for cancer therapeutics, 8-chloro-adenosine (8-Cl-Ado) possesses a ribose sugar. This unique nucleoside analog is RNA-directed and is in a phase I clinical trial for hematological malignancies. RNA-directed therapies are effective for the treatment of many malignancies as their activities are primarily aimed at short-lived transcripts, which are typically encoded by genes that promote the growth and survival of tumor cells such as cyclin E in breast cancer. Based on this, we hypothesized that 8-Cl-Ado, a transcription inhibitor, will be effective for the treatment of breast cancer cells. The metabolism of 8-Cl-Ado and the effect on ATP in the breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and BT-474 were measured using HPLC analysis. In these cells, 8-Cl-Ado was effectively taken up, converted to its cytotoxic metabolite, 8-Cl-ATP, and depleted the endogenous ATP levels. This in turn led to an inhibition of RNA synthesis. The RNA synthesis inhibition was associated with a depletion of cyclin E expression, which is indicative of a diminished tumorigenic phenotype. The final outcome of 8-Cl-Ado treatment of the breast cancer cells was growth inhibition due to an induction of apoptosis and a loss of clonogenic survival. These results indicate that 8-Cl-Ado, which is currently in clinic for hematological malignancies, may be an effective agent for the treatment of breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据