4.5 Article

Is chemotherapy necessary for premenopausal women with lower-risk node-positive, endocrine responsive breast cancer? 10-year update of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 11-93

期刊

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
卷 113, 期 1, 页码 137-144

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-9912-9

关键词

Breast cancer; Estrogen receptor; Goserelin; Ovarian ablation; Ovarian function suppression; Tamoxifen

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [U24 CA075362, CA-75362, U24 CA075362-12] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U24CA075362] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial 11-93 is the largest trial evaluating the role of the addition of chemotherapy to ovarian function suppression/ablation (OFS) and tamoxifen in premenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer. Methods IBCSG Trial 11-93 is a randomized trial comparing four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC: doxorubicin or epirubicin, plus cyclophosphamide) added to OFS and 5 years of tamoxifen versus OFS and tamoxifen without chemotherapy in premenopausal patients with node-positive, endocrine-responsive early breast cancer. There were 174 patients randomized from May 1993 to November 1998. The trial was closed before the target accrual was reached due to low accrual rate. Results Patients randomized tended to have lower risk node-positive disease and the median age was 45. After 10 years median follow up, there remains no difference between the two randomized treatment groups for disease-free (hazard ratio = 1.02 (0.57-1.83); P = 0.94) or overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.97 (0.44-2.16); P = 0.94). Conclusion This trial, although small, offers no evidence that AC chemotherapy provides additional disease control for premenopausal patients with lower-risk node-positive endocrine-responsive breast cancer who receive adequate adjuvant endocrine therapy. A large trial is needed to determine whether chemotherapy adds benefit to endocrine therapy for this population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据