4.4 Article

Longitudinal evaluation of hepatic osteodystrophy in children and adolescents with chronic cholestatic liver disease

期刊

出版社

ASSOC BRAS DIVULG CIENTIFICA
DOI: 10.1590/S0100-879X2010007500118

关键词

Hepatic osteodystrophy; Insulin-like growth factor-I; Osteoporosis; Bone mineral density; Bone remodeling

资金

  1. FAPESP [06/61394-2]
  2. FAEPA (Fundacao de Apoio ao Ensino Pesquisa e Assistencia)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bone mass loss is a major complication of chronic cholestatic liver disease (CCD). However, the long-term impact of CCD on bone mass acquisition is unknown. We longitudinally assessed bone mineral density (BMD) and factors involved in bone remodeling in 9 children and adolescents with CCD Child-Pugh A (5 boys/4 girls) and in 13 controls (6 boys/7 girls). The groups were evaluated twice, at baseline (T0) and after 3 years (T1), when osteocalcin, deoxypyridinoline, 25-hydroxyvitamin-D, parathyroid hormone, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), and BMD (L1-L4, proximal femur and total body) were determined. Serum levels of receptor activator for nuclear factor kB ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin were measured only at T1. Lumbar spine BMD was reanalyzed twice: after adjustment for bone age and to compensate for the height factor. Volumetric density was also estimated mathematically in L2-L4. The BMD of L1-L4 was lower in the CCD group (Z-score at T0: control = -1.2 +/- 0.8 vs CCD = -2.2 +/- 1.4, P < 0.05; T1: control = -0.7 +/- 0.8 vs CCD = -2.1 +/- 1.1, P < 0.05). Osteocalcin and deoxypyridinoline were similar for the two groups. The CCD group presented lower IGF-I (Z-score at T1: control = 1.4 +/- 2.8 vs CCD = -1.5 +/- 1.0, P < 0.05) and RANKL (control = 0.465 +/- 0.275 vs CCD = 0.195 +/- 0.250 pM, P < 0.05) than control. Children with compensated CCD Child-Pugh A showed early impairment of bone acquisition, with the impact being more severe in an initial phase and then tapering in a slowly progressive way. Reduction in endocrine IGF-I has a crucial role in this process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据