4.6 Article

Sleep Deprivation Affects Somatosensory Cortex Excitability as Tested Through Median Nerve Stimulation

期刊

BRAIN STIMULATION
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 732-739

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.04.006

关键词

Sleep deprivation; Human cortical excitability; Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs)

资金

  1. Compagnia di San Paolo, Programma Neuroscienze [3889 SD/sd, 2008.1300]
  2. Ministero Salute Ricerca Finalizzata [RF-2009-1528677]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Changes of cortical excitability after sleep deprivation (SD) in humans have been investigated mostly in motor cortex, while there is little empirical evidence concerning somatosensory cortex, and its plastic changes across SD. Objective: To assess excitability of primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and EEG voltage topographical characteristics associated with somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) during SD. Methods: Across 41 h of SD, 16 healthy subjects participated in 4 experimental sessions (11.00 a. m. and 11.00 p. m. of the 1st and 2nd day) with: a) subjective sleepiness ratings; b) EEG recordings; c) SEPs recordings; d) behavioral vigilance responses. Results: A clear enhancement of cortical excitability after SD was indexed by: (a) an amplitude increase of different SEPs component in S1; (b) higher voltage in occipital (around 35-43 ms) and fronto-central areas (around 47-62 ms). Circadian fluctuations did not affect cortical excitability. Voltage changes in S1 were strongly related with post-SD fluctuations of subjective and behavioral sleepiness. Conclusions: Sleep may have a role in keeping cortical excitability at optimal (namely below potentially dangerous) levels for the human brain, rebalancing progressive changes in cortical responsiveness to incoming inputs occurred during time spent awake. On the other hand, higher level of cortical responsiveness after sleep loss may be one of the mechanisms accounting for post-SD alterations in vigilance and behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据