4.8 Article

Ultrasensitive Photoelectrochemical Biosensing of Multiple Biomarkers on a Single Electrode by a Light Addressing Strategy

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 87, 期 18, 页码 9368-9375

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02148

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [20805035]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities [2042014kf0244]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2015CFB538]
  4. Large-Scale Instrument and Equipment Sharing Foundation of Wuhan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultrasensitive multiplexed detection of biomarkers on a single electrode is usually a great challenge for electrochemical sensors. Here, a light addressable photo-electrochemical sensor (LAPECS) for the sensitive detection of multiple DNA biomarkers on a single electrode was reported. The sensor was constructed through four steps: (1) immobilization of capture DNA (C-DNA) of different targets on different areas of a single large-sized gold film electrode, (2) recognition of each target DNA (T-DNA) and the corresponding biotin-labeled probe DNA (P-DNA) through hybridization, (3) reaction of the biotin-labeled probe DNA with a streptavidin-labeled all-carbon PEC bioprobe, and (4) PEC detection of multiple DNA targets one by one via a light addressing strategy. Through this principle, the LAPECS can achieve ultrasensitive detection of three DNA sequences related to hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV) and human immunodeficiency (HIV) viruses with a similar wide calibration range of 1.0 pM similar to 0.01 mu M and a low detection limit of 0.7 pM by using one kind of PEC bioprobe. Moreover, the detection throughput of LAPECS may be conveniently expanded by simply enlarging the size of the substrate electrode or reducing the size of the sensing arrays and the light beam. The present work thus demonstrates the promising applications of LAPECS in developing portable, sensitive, high-throughput, and cost-effective biosensing systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据