4.5 Article

Abnormal gray matter aging in chronic pain patients

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1456, 期 -, 页码 82-93

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.040

关键词

Aging; Chronic pain; Cortical thickness analysis; Voxel-based morphometry; Temporomandibular disorder; MRI

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP 53304] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Widespread brain gray matter (GM) atrophy is a normal part of the aging process. However, recent studies indicate that age-related GM changes are not uniform across the brain and may vary according to health status. Therefore the aims of this study were to determine whether chronic pain in temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is associated with abnormal GM aging in focal cortical regions associated with nociceptive processes, and the degree to which the cumulative effects of pain contributes to age effects. We found that patients have accelerated whole brain GM atrophy, compared to pain-free controls. We also identified three aberrant patterns of GM aging in five focal brain regions: 1) in the thalamus, GM volume correlated with age in the TMD patients but not in the control group; 2) in the anterior mid- and pregenual cingulate cortex (aMCC/pgACC), the TMD patients showed age-related cortical thinning, whereas the controls had age-related cortical thickening; and 3) in the dorsal striatum and the premotor cortex (PMC). Interestingly, the controls but not the patients showed age-related GM reductions. Finally, a result of particular note is that after accounting for the effects of TMD duration, age remained as a significant predictor of GM in the PMC and dorsal striatum. Thus, abnormal GM aging in TMD may be due to the progressive impact of TMD-related factors in pain-related regions, as well as inherent factors in motor regions, in patients with TMD. This study is the first to show that chronic pain is associated with abnormal GM aging in focal cortical regions associated with pain and motor processes. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据