4.5 Article

Functional recovery of the murine brain ischemia model using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived telencephalic progenitors

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1459, 期 -, 页码 52-60

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.049

关键词

Human induced pluripotent stem cell; Stroke; Transplantation

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24592124] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells possess the properties of self-renewal and pluripotency, similar to embryonic stem cells. They are a good candidate as a source of suitable cells for cell replacement therapy. In this study, we transplanted human iPS cell-derived neural progenitors into an ischemic mouse brain. Human iPS cells were differentiated into neuronal progenitors by serum-free culture of embryoid body-like aggregates (SFEBs). Focal cerebral ischemia was induced by occluding the middle cerebral artery using the intraluminal filament technique. Donor cells were transplanted into the ischemic lateral striatum 1 week after ischemia induction. Cells survived at the transplantation site, with migration of a proportion of cells along the external capsule and corpus callosum. Cells that were positive for the basal telencephalon marker, Nkx2.1, migrated into the basal part of the telencephalon. The pallial telencephalon marker, Emx1, was detected in cells that had migrated into the pallial part of the telencephalon. SFEBs differentiated into various types of neurons, and a retrograde tracer labeling study showed that differentiated cells integrated into host neural circuitry. Behavioral recovery was significantly enhanced in the transplanted group. Our results suggest that human iPS cell-derived neuronal progenitors survive and migrate in the ischemic brain, and contribute toward functional recovery via neural circuit reconstitution. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据