4.5 Article

Hypoxia-induced angiogenesis is delayed in aging mouse brain

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1389, 期 -, 页码 50-60

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.03.016

关键词

HIF-1; VEGF; Ang-2; COX-2; Brain capillary density

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS-38632]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic moderate hypoxia results in systemic and central nervous system adaptations that allow acclimatization. Long-term responses to hypoxia involve systemic physiological changes, metabolic regulation, and vascular remodeling. To investigate whether aging affects systemic and cerebral angiogenic adaptational changes in response to prolonged hypoxia, the present study assessed the responses of 4 month old (young) C57BL/6 mice and 24 month old (aged) C57BL/6 mice to chronic hypobaric hypoxia of 0.4 atm (290 ton). Compared to young mice, delayed body weight-loss recovery and a lag in polycythemic response were observed in aged mice. As previously shown, hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha) accumulation was attenuated and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression was decreased in the cerebral cortex of aged mice. Conversely, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC-1 alpha) protein upregulation were not affected in the aged mice. Despite an initial delay in cerebral angiogenic response in aged mice in the first week of hypoxia, no significant differences were observed in microvascular density between young and aged mice in normoxia and at 2 and 3 weeks of hypoxia. Taken together, these observations indicate that, even though the HIF-1 response to hypoxia is greatly attenuated, HIF-1 independent compensatory pathways are eventually able to maintain baseline and cerebral angiogenic adaptational changes to chronic hypoxia in aged mice. The delayed adaptive response, however, may result in decreased survival in the aged cohort. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据