4.5 Article

Influence of activity-induced axonal hypoexcitability on transmission of descending and segmental signals

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1320, 期 -, 页码 47-59

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.12.023

关键词

Axonal hyperpolarization; Corticospinal volley; Motoneuron excitability; Voluntary activity

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this experiment, the changes in excitability of motor axons produced after natural activity were measured in nine healthy subjects using 1 min of maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) of the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) by studying the relationship between stimulus intensity applied to the ulnar nerve and the size of the ADM compound muscle action potential (CMAP). On cessation of the contraction, there was a prominent right-shift of the input-output curve: the intensity required to produce a control CMAP similar to 60% of maximum, generated a post-contraction response similar to 25% of maximum. Similar changes occurred in the input-output curves obtained by recording the ulnar nerve volley evoked by same test stimulus for CMAP. Motor-evoked potential (MEP) and F-waves (and H-reflex in one subject) were recorded from ADM before and after 1 min of MVC. On cessation of contraction, the MEP input-output curves exhibited a significant right-shift: the stimulus required to evoke a pre-contraction maximum MEP (similar to 60% of maximum CMAP) generated a post-contraction response similar to 65% of initial values. One minute of MVC produced similar decreases of F (similar to 35%)- and H(similar to 30%)-ADM responses. All responses recovered their control value in 15-20 min after the end of contraction. The almost identical depressive effect produced by 1 min of MVC on peripherally and centrally generated muscle responses suggests a common conditioning factor. These findings are discussed within the context of activity-induced motor axonal hyperpolarizion. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据