4.5 Article

Effects of partial suppression of parkin on huntingtin mutant R6/1 mice

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1281, 期 -, 页码 91-100

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.039

关键词

Apoptosis; Autophagy; Dopamine neurons; Huntington's disease; Park-2 gene; Ubiquitin proteosomal system

资金

  1. Spanish Minister of Health, Instituto de Salud Carlos III [FIS 2007/725]
  2. CIBER [2006/05/0059]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Huntington's disease (HD) is a neurodegenerative disorder caused by an expansion of polyglutamines which makes huntingtin more resistant to degradation. Parkin is an ubiquitin ligase which promotes proteosomal degradation of abnormal proteins. We investigated whether partial suppression of parkin increases HD phenotype. We studied the behavior and brain histology and biochemistry of the mice produced by interbreeding of R6/1 (model of HD in mice) with Park-2(-/-) (parkin null mice): R6/1, WT (wild-type), PK+/-(hemizygotic deletion of Park-2) and R6/1/PK+/-. R6/1 and R6/1/PK+/- mice had abnormal motor and exploratory behavior. R6/1/PK+/- mice were more akinetic. These two groups of mice had severe but similar loss of nigrostriatal dopamine neurons and monoamine levels in striatum. R6/1/PK+/- mice had fewer huntingtin inclusions and a greater number of TUNEL+ cells than R6/1 in striatum but there were no differences in the hippocampus. DARPP-32 protein was equally reduced in striatum of R6/1 and R6/1/PK+/- mice. Striatal levels of GSH were increased, of HSP-70 reduced and of CHIP unchanged in both R6/1 and R6/1/PK+/- mice. LC-3 II/I ratios were significantly increased in striatum of R6/1/PK+/- mice. Partial suppression of parkin slightly aggravates the phenotype in R6/1 mice, confirming a pathogenic role of the UPS in the processing of mutant huntingtin. The absence of massive additional cellular lesions in R6/1/PK+/- mice suggests the existence of compensatory mechanisms, such as autophagy, for the processing of huntingtin. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据