4.5 Article

Expression changes of multiple brain-derived neurotrophic factor transcripts in selective spinal nerve ligation model and complete Freund's adjuvant model

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1206, 期 -, 页码 13-19

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.12.004

关键词

brain-derived neurotrophic factor; multiple transcripts; dorsal root ganglion; real-time reverse; transcription-polymerase; chain reaction; selective spinal nerve ligation; inflammation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression changes in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and spinal cord in some pain models. Recently, rat BDNF transcripts containing novel 5' untranslated exons were identified and characterized, and a new numbering system for rat BDNF exons was introduced. We examined the expression profiles of these novel BDNF transcripts in bilateral L4/5 DRGs in an L5-selective spinal nerve ligation (SSNL) model and bilateral L5 DRGs in a complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) model of rats. L5SSNL increased significantly (P<0.05) the expression of total BDNF mRNA and exon I, IIA, IIB, IIC, III, IV, VI, and IXA transcripts in ipsilateral L4 DRG. Although expression of total BDNF mRNA remained unchanged in ipsilateral L5 DRG in the L5SSNL model, expression of exon I transcript increased significantly (P<0.05) and that of exon IV transcript decreased significantly (P<0.05). The expression profiles of the variant exons in ipsilateral L4 DRG of the L5SSNL model were quite similar to those in ipsilateral DRG of the CFA model, and exon I transcript was the most common BDNF mRNA in these DRGs. Although L5SSNL increased significantly (P<0.05) the expression of total BDNF mRNA and exon IIC and IXA transcripts in the contralateral L4/5 DRGs, CFA treatment did not alter the expression of total BDNF mRNA or specific transcripts in the contralateral DRGs. These findings suggest that exon I plays an important role in the increase in BDNF expression in ipsilateral DRGs regardless of condition. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据