4.5 Article

Amyloid pathway-based candidate gene analysis of [11C]PiB-PET in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort

期刊

BRAIN IMAGING AND BEHAVIOR
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 1-15

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11682-011-9136-1

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; ADNI; Pathway-based gene analysis; PiB-PET; Endophenotype; Voxel-based analysis

资金

  1. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National Institutes of Health (NIH) [U01 AG024904]
  2. National Institute on Aging (NIA)
  3. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)
  4. NIH [U01 AG024904, P30 AG010129, K01 AG030514, NIBIB R03 EB008674, NIBIB R03 EB008674S1, UL1RR025761, NLM T15LM07117, U01 HL086528, R01 MH078151, AG027859, AG027984, AG024904, P01 NS15655, R01 HL079540, R01 DA022520, R01 DA016423, AG018402, NIA R01-AG11378, U01 AG024904-01, P41 RR023953, R01 AG10897, P01 AG19724, P50 AG23501, R24 RR021992, R01 NS031966, P01 AG012435, R01 CA101318, R01 AG19771, RC2 AG036535, P30 AG10133-18S1, U01 AG032984]
  5. Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC) [U01 AG032984]
  6. National Cell Repository for AD (NCRAD) [U24 AG21886]
  7. NIA
  8. NIH (CTSI) [TL1 RR025759]
  9. NIAAA [R21AA016901, NIDA R03DA024774, NIAAA R01AA017661, NIA P30AG010133-20]
  10. Indiana State Department of Health [PI]
  11. IUPUI
  12. Indiana CTSI Clinical Research Center [UL RR025761]
  13. NIH (NIA) [U01 AG032984, 5U24AG021886, R01 AR047822, R01 NS037167, N01NS32357, U01AA014809, R01 CA141668, P01 AG018397, NCRR U24 RR021992, NCIRE AG036535]
  14. Families of Spinal Muscular Atrophy
  15. Muscular Dystrophy Association
  16. HP Therapeutics Foundation
  17. CHDI Foundation
  18. AstraZeneca
  19. Bioline
  20. Bristol
  21. Myers-Squibb
  22. Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  23. Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma
  24. Janssen
  25. Novartis
  26. Merck Serono
  27. Pfizer Inc.
  28. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
  29. Roche
  30. Minister Pharmaceuticals plc
  31. Transdisciplinary Imaging Genetics Center (TIGC) [P20 RR020837]
  32. NIH/NINDS [R01 NS059873]
  33. Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium
  34. Arizona Science Foundation
  35. Arizona Alzheimer's Research Center
  36. Alzheimer's Association
  37. Elan Corporation
  38. GE Healthcare
  39. Bayer-Schering Pharma
  40. IBA
  41. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
  42. Neuroptix Corporation
  43. US Department of Energy
  44. Anonymous Foundation
  45. GE Healthcare (amyloid imaging agents for brain applications)
  46. Neuroptix Corporation (amyloid imaging agents for eye applications)
  47. Pfizer, Inc.
  48. Mayo Foundation
  49. Nestl
  50. Kenes International
  51. Merck and Co.
  52. Avid Radiopharmaceuticals Inc.
  53. US Department of Defense
  54. Veterans Administration
  55. State of California
  56. Eli Lilly and Company
  57. Siemens AG
  58. Welch Allyn Inc
  59. Indiana Economic Development Corporation (IEDC)
  60. Foundation for the NIH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amyloid imaging with [(11) C]Pittsburgh Compound-B (PiB) provides in vivo data on plaque deposition in those with, or at risk for, Alzheimer's disease (AD). We performed a gene-based association analysis of 15 quality-controlled amyloid-pathway associated candidate genes in 103 Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative participants. The mean normalized PiB uptake value across four brain regions known to have amyloid deposition in AD was used as a quantitative phenotype. The minor allele of an intronic SNP within DHCR24 was identified and associated with a lower average PiB uptake. Further investigation at whole-brain voxel-wise level indicated that non-carriers of the minor allele had higher PiB uptake in frontal regions compared to carriers. DHCR24 has been previously shown to confer resistance against beta-amyloid and oxidative stress-induced apoptosis, thus our findings support a neuroprotective role. Pathway-based genetic analysis of targeted molecular imaging phenotypes appears promising to help elucidate disease pathophysiology and identify potential therapeutic targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据