4.7 Article

Imatinib methanesulfonate reduces hippocampal amyloid-beta and restores cognitive function following repeated endotoxin exposure

期刊

BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND IMMUNITY
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 24-28

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2013.05.002

关键词

Lipopolysaccharide; Cytokines; Amyloid-beta; Alzheimer's disease; Memory

资金

  1. Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board [NHARP9424]
  2. Texas Christian University [RCAF60675]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized, in part, by atrophy of the adult brain and increased presence of extracellular amyloid-beta (A beta) plaques. Previous studies in our lab have shown that peripheral inflammation can lead to increased central A beta and deficits in learning and memory. In order to determine whether A beta accumulation in the brain is responsible for the learning deficits, we attempted to decrease peripheral production of A beta in order to reduce central A beta accumulation. It has previously been shown that A beta is produced in large quantities in the liver, and is transferred across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Recent research has shown that peripheral treatment with imatinib methanesulfonate salt (IM), known to interfere with the interaction between gamma (gamma)-secretase and the gamma-secretase activating protein (GSAP), decreases the cleavage of peripheral amyloid precursor protein into A beta. Because IM poorly penetrates the BBB, we hypothesized that co-administration of IM with LPS would decrease peripheral production of A beta in the presence of LPS-induced inflammation, leading to a decrease in A beta accumulation in the hippocampus. We show that peripheral IM treatment eliminates hippocampal A beta elevation that follows LPS-induced peripheral inflammation. Importantly, IM also eliminates the cognitive impairment seen following seven consecutive days of LPS administration, implicating A beta peptides as a likely cause of these cognitive deficits. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据