4.7 Article

In vivo MRI analysis of an inflammatory injury in the developing brain

期刊

BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND IMMUNITY
卷 24, 期 5, 页码 759-767

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2009.11.005

关键词

Periventricular leukomalacia; Lipopolysaccharide; Diffusion tensor imaging; Radial diffusivity; High field MRI; Myelin; White matter injury; Inflammation; Apparent diffusion coefficient

资金

  1. Green Fund
  2. NIH [P50-NS35902]
  3. Reuter Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cerebral periventricular white matter injury stands as a leading cause of cognitive, behavioral and motor impairment in preterm infants. There is epidemiological and histopathological evidence demonstrating the role of prenatal or neonatal inflammation in brain injury in preterm infants. In order to define the effect of an inflammatory insult in the developing brain on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, we obtained high resolution conventional and diffusion MR images of the brain of rat pups after an inflammatory injury. Rat pups were subjected on postnatal day 5 (P5) to a stereotaxic injection of lipopolysaccharide in the corpus callosum and then imaged at 11.7 T on days 0, 2 and 4 following the injury. They were subsequently sacrificed for immunohistochemistry. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) acquired at high) spatial resolution showed an initial reduction of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the white matter. This was followed by an increase in ADC value and in T2 relaxation time constant in the white matter, with an associated increase of radial diffusivity of the corpus callosum, and a 10-fold increase in ventricular size. On histology, these MR changes corresponded to widespread astrogliosis, and decreased proportion of the section areas containing cresyl violet positive stain. The increase in radial diffusivity, typically attributed to myelin loss, occurred in this case despite the absence of myelin at this developmental stage. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据