4.6 Article

Systematic vertebral fracture assessment in asymptomatic postmenopausal women

期刊

BONE
卷 52, 期 1, 页码 176-180

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.09.023

关键词

Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA); Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); Osteoporosis; Women; Vertebral fractures

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Recognition of vertebral fractures (VFs) changes the patient's diagnostic classification, estimation of fracture risk, and threshold for pharmacological intervention. Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) enables the detection of VFs in the same session as bone mineral density (BMD) testing. Objective: To study prevalence and risk factors of VFs using VFA in asymptomatic women and measure its effect on treatment recommendations. Methods: We enrolled 908 postmenopausal women (mean age, weight and BMI of 60.9 +/- 7.7 (50-91) years, 73.2 +/- 13.2 (35-150) kg and 29.8 +/- 5.3 (14.5-50.8) kg/m(2), respectively. Lateral VFA images and scans of the lumbar spine and proximal femur were obtained using a GE Healthcare Lunar Prodigy densitometer. VFs were defined using a combination of Genant semiquantitative (SQ) approach and morphometry. Results: VFs were identified in 382 patients (42.0%): 203 (22.3%) had grade 1 and 179 (19.7%) had grade 2 or 3. The prevalence of VFA-detected fractures globally increased significantly with age and as BMI and BMD declined. A fracture was identified on VFA in 63 (28.3%) women with normal BMD (8.5% had grade 2/3 VFs) and in 145 (38.5%) with osteopenia (15.7% had grade 2/3 VFs). Stepwise regression analysis showed that presence of VFs was independently related to age, BMI, number of parity, history of peripheral fracture and lumbar spine BMD. Conclusion: A high proportion of women with asymptomatic VFs would not receive treatment if screening were based only on BMD evaluation. Our results support the recommendation to enlarge the indications of VFA in the presence of risk factors such as age over 60, multiparity, history of peripheral traumatic fractures and low BMI. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据