4.6 Article

Is progression of periodontitis relevantly influenced by systemic antibiotics? A clinical randomized trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
卷 42, 期 9, 页码 832-842

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12441

关键词

amoxicillin; metronidazole; attachment loss; clinical relevance; debridement; outcome parameter; periodontitis; randomised controlled trial; systemic antibiotics

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)) [EH 365 1-1]
  2. University of Munster

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimWe investigated the long-term impact of adjunctive systemic antibiotics on periodontal disease progression. Periodontal therapy is frequently supplemented by systemic antibiotics, although its impact on the course of disease is still unclear. Material & MethodsThis prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multi-centre trial comprising patients suffering from moderate to severe periodontitis evaluated the impact of rational adjunctive use of systemic amoxicillin 500mg plus metronidazole 400mg (3x/day, 7days) on attachment loss. The primary outcome was the percentage of sites showing further attachment loss (PSAL) 1.3mm after the 27.5months observation period. Standardized therapy comprised mechanical debridement in conjunction with antibiotics or placebo administration, and maintenance therapy at 3months intervals. ResultsFrom 506 participating patients, 406 were included in the intention to treat analysis. Median PSAL observed in placebo group was 7.8% compared to 5.3% in antibiotics group (Q25 4.7%/Q75 14.1%; Q25 3.1%/Q75 9.9%; p<0.001 respectively). ConclusionsBoth treatments were effective in preventing disease progression. Compared to placebo, the prescription of empiric adjunctive systemic antibiotics showed a small absolute, although statistically significant, additional reduction in further attachment loss. Therapists should consider the patient's overall risk for periodontal disease when deciding for or against adjunctive antibiotics prescription.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据