4.6 Article

Effects of TNF-α blocking on experimental periodontitis and type 2 diabetes in obese diabetic Zucker rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
卷 42, 期 9, 页码 807-816

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12442

关键词

animal models; obese diabetic Zucker rats; periodontitis; TNF-alpha; Type 2 diabetes

资金

  1. Danish Medical Research Council
  2. Simon Spies Foundation
  3. Colgate
  4. Danish Diabetes Association
  5. Danish Dental Association
  6. Danish Diabetes Academy by the Novo Nordisk Foundation
  7. Horslev-Fonden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveTumour necrosis factor (TNF-) is considered a key signalling modulator in the pathogenesis of both periodontitis (PD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). This study aims at elucidating the effect of TNF- blocking on the interplay between PD and DM2. MethodsObese diabetic Zucker rats and their lean littermates were divided into five treatment groups with or without periodontitis. Anti-TNF- treatment was provided with Etanercept injections. Diabetic state was evaluated by oral glucose tolerance test, the homeostatic model assessment, free fatty acids and blood glucose. Systemic inflammation was assessed by measurement of interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6 and TNF- in plasma. Kidney complications were evaluated by real-time rtPCR, creatinine clearance rate, urinary albumin excretion and increase in weight. PD was evaluated by registration of alveolar bone level. ResultsAfter 4weeks the diabetic state was modified by Etanercept treatment with lower insulin levels and lower homeostatic model assessment. Furthermore, while kidney complications were reduced by Etanercept treatment, PD had no effect. PD was influenced by diabetic state, but the impact was attenuated by Etanercept treatment. ConclusionIn this study anti-TNF- treatment improved glucose tolerance and compensated for the increased periodontal disease in obese diabetic Zucker. PD did not influence diabetic parameters assessed including complications of the rats kidneys.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据