4.2 Article

Acupuncture regulates the glucose metabolism in cerebral functional regions in chronic stage ischemic stroke patients-a PET-CT cerebral functional imaging study

期刊

BMC NEUROSCIENCE
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-13-75

关键词

Waiguan (TE5); Sham point; Ischemic stroke; Needling/sham needling; PET-CT cerebral functional imaging; Cerebral activating/deactivating effect

资金

  1. National 973 Programs of China [2006CB504505, 2012CB518504]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [90709027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Acupuncture has been applied to aid in the recovery of post-stroke patients, but its mechanism is unclear. This study aims to analyze the relationship between acupuncture and glucose metabolism in cerebral functional regions in post-stroke patients using (18)FDG PET-CT techniques. Forty-three ischemic stroke patients were randomly divided into 5 groups: the Waiguan (TE5) needling group, the TE5 sham needling group, the sham point needling group, the sham point sham needling group and the non-needling group. Cerebral functional images of all patients were then acquired using PET-CT scans and processed by SPM2 software. Results: Compared with the non-needling group, sham needling at TE5 and needling/sham needling at the sham point did not activate cerebral areas. However, needling at TE5 resulted in the activation of Brodmann Area (BA) 30. Needling/sham needling at TE5 and needling at the sham point did not deactivate any cerebral areas, whereas sham needling at the sham point led to deactivation in BA6. Compared with sham needling at TE5, needling at TE5 activated BA13, 19 and 47 and did not deactivate any areas. Compared with needling at the sham point, needling at TE5 had no associated activation but a deactivating effect on BA9. Conclusion: Needling at TE5 had a regulating effect on cerebral functional areas shown by PET-CT, and this may relate to its impact on the recovery of post-stroke patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据