Network meta-analysis-highly attractive but more methodological research is needed

Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases

(2014) F Song et al.   HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

Comparative Benefits and Harms of Second-Generation Antidepressants: Background Paper for the American College of Physicians

(2013) Gerald Gartlehner et al.   ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

Study designs to detect sponsorship and other biases in systematic reviews

(2010) Sofia Dias et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Mixed treatment comparison analysis provides internally coherent treatment effect estimates based on overviews of reviews and can reveal inconsistency

(2010) Deborah M. Caldwell et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial

(2010) Georgia Salanti et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis

(2010) S. Dias et al.   STATISTICS IN MEDICINE

A case study of multiple-treatments meta-analysis demonstrates that covariates should be considered

(2009) Georgia Salanti et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Ranking antidepressants

(2009) John PA Ioannidis   LANCET

Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis

(2009) Andrea Cipriani et al.   LANCET

AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program

(2008) Roger Chou et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Reporting Bias in Drug Trials Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: Review of Publication and Presentation

(2008) Kristin Rising et al.   PLOS MEDICINE

Adjusted indirect comparison may be less biased than direct comparison for evaluating new pharmaceutical interventions

(2007) F. Song et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY