Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Qstatistics

Treatment-effect estimates adjusted for small-study effects via a limit meta-analysis

(2010) G. Rucker et al.   BIOSTATISTICS

Sequential meta-analysis: an efficient decision-making tool

(2010) Ingeborg van der Tweel et al.   Clinical Trials

Comments on ‘Empirical vs natural weighting in random effects meta-analysis’ by JJ Shuster, Statistics in Medicine 2009; 26, Published online, DOI: 10.1002/sim.3607

(2010) Gerta Rücker et al.   STATISTICS IN MEDICINE

Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias

(2010) Masayuki Henmi et al.   STATISTICS IN MEDICINE

Graphical displays for meta-analysis: An overview with suggestions for practice

(2010) Judith Anzures-Cabrera et al.   Research Synthesis Methods

Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study

(2009) Santiago G Moreno et al.   BMC Medical Research Methodology

How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare with its more efficient but harder to compute counterparts?

(2009) Dan Jackson et al.   JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE

Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may mislead

(2008) Gerta Rücker et al.   BMC Medical Research Methodology

Reducing Uncertainties About the Effects of Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data From 18 Randomized Trials

(2008)   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis

(2008) Julian P. T. Higgins et al.   JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY

A robustP-value for treatment effect in meta-analysis with publication bias

(2008) John B. Copas et al.   STATISTICS IN MEDICINE