4.5 Article

Serum biomarkers predictive of cure in Chagas disease patients after nifurtimox treatment

期刊

BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-302

关键词

Chagas disease; Biomarkers; Treatment; Nifurtimox; Proteomics

资金

  1. Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi)
  2. Department of International Development (DFID)/United Kingdom and Medecins Sans Frontieres (Doctors without Borders)/International

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Chagas disease (CD), caused by the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi, remains an important public health issue in many Central and South American countries, as well as non-endemic areas with high rates of immigration from these countries. Existing treatment options for CD are limited and often unsatisfactory. Moreover the lack of post-treatment tests of cure limits the development of new drugs. To address this issue, we sought to identify serum biomarkers following nifurtimox (Nfx) treatment that could be used as an early test of cure and/or markers of a therapeutic response. Methods: Human sera from Chagas patients pre-and post-treatment with Nfx (n = 37) were compared to samples from healthy subjects (n = 37) using a range of proteomic and immunologic techniques. Biomarker peaks with the best discriminatory power were further characterized. Results: Using serum samples (n = 111), we validated the presence of five key biomarkers identified in our previous study, namely human apolipoprotein A-I (APOA1) and specific fragments thereof and one fragment of human fibronectin (FN1). In chagasic serum samples all biomarkers except full-length APOA1 were upregulated. These five biomarkers returned to normal in 43% (16/37) of the patients treated with Nfx at three years after treatment. Conclusions: The normalization of biomarker patterns strongly associated with CD suggests that these markers can be used to identify patients in whom Nfx treatment is successful. We believe that these are the first biomarkers predictive of cure in CD patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据