4.4 Article

The influence of organizational context on the use of research by nurses in Canadian pediatric hospitals

期刊

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-351

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [CTP-79854, MOP-86605]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Organizational context is recognized as an important influence on the successful implementation of research by healthcare professionals. However, there is relatively little empirical evidence to support this widely held view. Methods: The objective of this study was to identify dimensions of organizational context and individual (nurse) characteristics that influence pediatric nurses' self-reported use of research. Data on research use, individual, and contextual variables were collected from registered nurses (N = 735) working on 32 medical, surgical and critical care units in eight Canadian pediatric hospitals using an online survey. We used Generalized Estimating Equation modeling to account for the correlated structure of the data and to identify which contextual dimensions and individual characteristics predict two kinds of self-reported research use: instrumental (direct) and conceptual (indirect). Results: Significant predictors of instrumental research use included: at the individual level; belief suspension-implement, research use in the past, and at the hospital unit (context) level; culture, and the proportion on nurses possessing a baccalaureate degree or higher. Significant predictors of conceptual research use included: at the individual nurse level; belief suspension-implement, problem solving ability, use of research in the past, and at the hospital unit (context) level; leadership, culture, evaluation, formal interactions, informal interactions, organizational slack-space, and unit specialty. Conclusions: Hospitals, by focusing attention on modifiable elements of unit context may positively influence nurses' reported use of research. This influence of context may extend to the adoption of best practices in general and other innovative or quality interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据