4.7 Article

A first genetic map of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) reveals long-range genome structure conservation in the palms

期刊

BMC GENOMICS
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-285

关键词

Sex chromosome; Genotyping by sequencing; Comparative genomics

资金

  1. Qatar Foundation's National Priorities Research Program - Exceptional Award (NPRP-EP) [NPRPX-014-4-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The date palm is one of the oldest cultivated fruit trees. It is critical in many ways to cultures in arid lands by providing highly nutritious fruit while surviving extreme heat and environmental conditions. Despite its importance from antiquity, few genetic resources are available for improving the productivity and development of the dioecious date palm. To date there has been no genetic map and no sex chromosome has been identified. Results: Here we present the first genetic map for date palm and identify the putative date palm sex chromosome. We placed similar to 4000 markers on the map using nearly 1200 framework markers spanning a total of 1293 cM. We have integrated the genetic map, derived from the Khalas cultivar, with the draft genome and placed up to 19% of the draft genome sequence scaffolds onto linkage groups for the first time. This analysis revealed approximately similar to 1.9 cM/Mb on the map. Comparison of the date palm linkage groups revealed significant long-range synteny to oil palm. Analysis of the date palm sex-determination region suggests it is telomeric on linkage group 12 and recombination is not suppressed in the full chromosome. Conclusions: Based on a modified gentoyping-by-sequencing approach we have overcome challenges due to lack of genetic resources and provide the first genetic map for date palm. Combined with the recent draft genome sequence of the same cultivar, this resource offers a critical new tool for date palm biotechnology, palm comparative genomics and a better understanding of sex chromosome development in the palms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据