4.4 Article

Private haplotypes can reveal local adaptation

期刊

BMC GENETICS
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-15-61

关键词

Local adaptation; Haplotype; Positive selection; Human height

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council Formas
  2. Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education (STINT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Genome-wide scans for regions that demonstrate deviating patterns of genetic variation have become common approaches for finding genes targeted by selection. Several genomic patterns have been utilized for this purpose, including deviations in haplotype homozygosity, frequency spectra and genetic differentiation between populations. Results: We describe a novel approach based on the Maximum Frequency of Private Haplotypes - MFPH - to search for signals of recent population-specific selection. The MFPH statistic is straightforward to compute for phased SNP-and sequence-data. Using both simulated and empirical data, we show that MFPH can be a powerful statistic to detect recent population-specific selection, that it performs at the same level as other commonly used summary statistics (e.g. F-ST, iHS and XP-EHH), and that MFPH in some cases capture signals of selection that are missed by other statistics. For instance, in the Maasai, MFPH reveals a strong signal of selection in a region where other investigated statistics fail to pick up a clear signal that contains the genes DOCK3, MAPKAPK3 and CISH. This region has been suggested to affect height in many populations based on phenotype-genotype association studies. It has specifically been suggested to be targeted by selection in Pygmy groups, which are on the opposite end of the human height spectrum compared to the Maasai. Conclusions: From the analysis of both simulated and publicly available empirical data, we show that MFPH represents a summary statistic that can provide further insight concerning population-specific adaptation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据