4.6 Article

Rapid initial decline in BCR-ABL1 is associated with superior responses to second-line nilotinib in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia

期刊

BMC CANCER
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-173

关键词

Chronic myeloid leukemia; Nilotinib; Mathematical modeling; BCR-ABL; Molecular response

类别

资金

  1. Novartis
  2. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  3. Pfizer Inc.
  4. ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  6. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA018029] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We evaluated BCR-ABL1 kinetics in patients treated with nilotinib and analyzed whether a dynamic model of changes in BCR-ABL1 levels over time could be used to predict long-term responses. Methods: Patients from the nilotinib registration trial (CAMN107A2101; registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00109707) who had imatinib-resistant or -intolerant Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) or accelerated phase with BCR-ABL1 > 10% (on the international scale [IS]) at baseline and, in the first 6 months, had at least three BCR-ABL1 transcript measurements and an average daily dose of at least 720 mg were included in this analysis (N = 123). Results: More than half of patients (65/123; 53%) had a slow monophasic response and the remainder (58/123; 47%) had a biphasic response, in which patients had a rapid initial decrease in BCR-ABL1 transcripts followed by a more gradual response. The biphasic response type strongly correlated with improved event-free survival (EFS). Data in the first 6 months of follow-up were sufficient to predict EFS at 24 months. Conclusions: Unlike newly diagnosed patients with Ph+CML-CP-in whom the majority had a biphasic response-approximately half of patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant CML had a slower, monophasic response. Second-line patients who did have a biphasic response had an EFS outlook similar to that of newly diagnosed patients treated with imatinib. Our model was comparable to using BCR-ABL1 (IS) <= 10% at 6 months as a threshold for predicting EFS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据