4.7 Article

Increased T follicular helper cells and germinal center B cells are required for cGVHD and bronchiolitis obliterans

期刊

BLOOD
卷 123, 期 25, 页码 3988-3998

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-03-562231

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute grant [P01 CA142106-06A1]
  2. National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grants [P01 AI 056299, T32 AI 007313]
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant [T32 HL 00706237]
  4. National Center for Research Resources Shared Instrumentation [S10 RR16851]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Having shown that germinal center (GC) formation and immunoglobulin deposition are required for multiorgan system cGVHD and associated bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) in a murine model, we hypothesized that T follicular helper (Tfh) cells are necessary for cGVHD by supporting GC formation and maintenance. We show that increased frequency of Tfh cells correlated with increased GC B cells, cGVHD, and BOS. Although administering a highly depletionary anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) to mice with established cGVHD resulted in peripheral B-cell depletion, B cells remained in the lung, and BOS was not reversed. BOS could be treated by eliminating production of interleukin-21 (IL-21) by donorT cells or IL-21 receptor (IL-21R) signaling of donor B cells. Development of BOS was dependent upon T cells expressing the chemokine receptor CXCR5 to facilitate T-cell trafficking to secondary lymphoid organ follicles. Blocking mAbs for IL-21/IL-21R, inducible T-cell costimulator (ICOS)/ICOS ligand, and CD40L/CD40 hindered GC formation and cGVHD. These data provide novel insights into cGVHD pathogenesis, indicate a role for Tfh cells in these processes, and suggest a new line of therapy using mAbs targeting Tfh cells to reverse cGVHD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据