4.7 Article

A prognostic model to predict survival in 867 World Health Organization-defined essential thrombocythemia at diagnosis: a study by the International Working Group on Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment

期刊

BLOOD
卷 120, 期 6, 页码 1197-1201

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-01-403279

关键词

-

资金

  1. Associazione Italiana contro Leucemie (AIL
  2. Linfomi, Mieloma) Varese Onlus
  3. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (Special Program Molecular Clinical Oncology 5x1000) [1005]
  4. Fondazione Cariplo
  5. Regione Lombardia
  6. Italian Ministry of Health
  7. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC
  8. Milano, Italy) Special Program Molecular Clinical Oncology 5x1000 [1005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia (ET) has been updated in the last World Health Organization (WHO) classification. We developed a prognostic model to predict survival at diagnosis, named IPSET (International Prognostic Score for ET), studying patients with WHO-defined ET. Age 60 years or older, leukocyte count >= 11 x 109/L, and prior thrombosis significantly affected survival, by multivariable Cox regression. On the basis of the hazard ratio, we assigned 2 points to age and 1 each to leukocyte count and thrombosis. So, the IPSET model allocated 867 patients into 3 risk categories with significantly different survival: low (sum of points = 0; median survival not reached), intermediate (sum = 1-2; median survival 24.5 years), and high (sum = 3-4, median survival 13.8 years). The IPSET model was further validated in 2 independent cohorts including 132 WHO-defined ET and 234 Polycythemia Vera Study Group-defined ET patients. The IPSET model was able to predict the occurrence of thrombosis, and not to predict post-ET myelofibrosis. In conclusion, IPSET, based on age >= 60 years, leukocyte count >= 11 x 109/L, and history of thrombosis allows prognostic assessment of WHO-defined ET and the validation process makes IPSET applicable in all patients phenotypically appearing as ET. (Blood. 2012;120(6):1197-1201)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据