4.7 Article

Double unit grafts successfully extend the application of umbilical cord blood transplantation in adults with acute leukemia

期刊

BLOOD
卷 121, 期 5, 页码 752-758

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-08-449108

关键词

-

资金

  1. Public Health Service [U24-CA76518]
  2. National Cancer Institute
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  4. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Health Resources and Services Administration [HHSH234200637015C]
  5. Office of Naval Research, Department of Navy to the National Marrow Donor Program [N00014-10-01-0204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell dose is a major limitation for umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation because units containing a minimum of 2.5 x 10(7) total nucleated cells (TNC)/kilogram patient body weight are frequently not available. The transplantation of 2 partially HLA-matched UCB units has been adopted as a simple approach for increasing the TNC. We sought to determine whether the relative safety and efficacy of this approach was comparable with a single UCB transplantation. Included are adults with acute leukemia who received transplants with 1 (n = 106) or 2 (n = 303) UCB units. All UCB units for single UCB transplantations contained TNC >= 2.5 x 10(7)/kg. For double UCB transplantations, the total TNC for units 1 and 2 were > 2.5 x 10(7)/kg but in approximately half of these transplantations, 1 of the 2 units contained < 2.5 x 10(7) TNC/kg. Adjusting for factors associated with outcomes, risks of neutrophil recovery (odds ratio 0.83, P = .59), transplantation-related mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, P = .63), relapse (HR 0.90, P = .64), and overall mortality (HR 0.93, P = .62) was similar after double UCB and adequate dose single UCB transplantations. These data support double UCB unit transplantation for acute leukemia when an adequately dosed single UCB unit is not available thereby extending access to nearly all patients. (Blood. 2013; 121(5): 752-758)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据