4.7 Article

Complete response correlates with long-term progression-free and overall survival in elderly myeloma treated with novel agents: analysis of 1175 patients

期刊

BLOOD
卷 117, 期 11, 页码 3025-3031

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-307645

关键词

-

资金

  1. Associazione Italiana Ricerca Cancro, Milan, Italy
  2. Associazione Italiana Leucemie, Rome, Italy
  3. Compagnia di S. Paolo, Turin, Italy
  4. Fondazione Neoplasie Sangue Onlus, Turin, Italy
  5. Ministero Universita Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica, Rome, Italy
  6. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Rome, Italy
  7. Celgene
  8. Janssen-Cilag
  9. Pharmion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Complete response (CR) was an uncommon event in elderly myeloma patients until novel agents were combined with standard oral melphalan-prednisone. This analysis assesses the impact of treatment response on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We retrospectively analyzed 1175 newly diagnosed myeloma patients, enrolled in 3 multicenter trials, treated with melphalanprednisone alone (n = 332), melphalan-prednisone- thalidomide (n = 332), melphalan-prednisone-bortezomib (n = 257), or melphalan-prednisone-bortezomib-thalidomide (n = 254). After a median follow-up of 29 months, the 3-year PFS andOSwere 67% and 27% (hazard ratio = 0.16; P < .001), and 91% and 70% (hazard ratio = 0.15; P < .001) in patients who obtained CR and in those who achieved very good partial response, respectively. Similar results were observed in patients older than 75 years. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the achievement of CR was an independent predictor of longer PFS and OS, regardless of age, International Staging System stage, and treatment. These findings highlight a significant association between the achievement of CR and long-term outcome, and support the use of novel agents to achieve maximal response in elderly patients, including those more than 75 years. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00232934, #ISRCTN 90692740, and #NCT01063179. (Blood. 2011; 117(11): 3025-3031)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据