4.7 Article

A novel adoptive transfer model of chronic lymphocytic leukemia suggests a key role for T lymphocytes in the disease

期刊

BLOOD
卷 117, 期 20, 页码 5463-5472

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-324210

关键词

-

资金

  1. Karches Foundation
  2. Prince Foundation
  3. Marks Foundation
  4. Jerome Levy Foundation
  5. Leon Levy Foundation
  6. Tebil Foundation Inc
  7. Joseph Eletto Leukemia Research Fund
  8. Lauri Strauss Leukemia Foundation
  9. Leukemia and Lymphoma Research, UK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is an incurable adult disease of unknown etiology. Understanding the biology of CLL cells, particularly cell maturation and growth in vivo, has been impeded by lack of a reproducible adoptive transfer model. We report a simple, reproducible system in which primary CLL cells proliferate in nonobese diabetes/severe combined immunodeficiency/gamma c(null) mice under the influence of activated CLL-derived T lymphocytes. By cotransferring autologous T lymphocytes, activated in vivo by alloantigens, the survival and growth of primary CFSE-labeled CLL cells in vivo is achieved and quantified. Using this approach, we have identified key roles for CD4(+) T cells in CLL expansion, a direct link between CD38 expression by leukemic B cells and their activation, and support for CLL cells preferentially proliferating in secondary lymphoid tissues. The model should simplify analyzing kinetics of CLL cells in vivo, deciphering involvement of nonleukemic elements and nongenetic factors promoting CLL cell growth, identifying and characterizing potential leukemic stem cells, and permitting preclinical studies of novel therapeutics. Because autologous activated T lymphocytes are 2-edged swords, generating unwanted graph-versus-host and possibly autologous antitumor reactions, the model may also facilitate analyses of T-cell populations involved in immune surveillance relevant to hematopoietic transplantation and tumor cytoxicity. (Blood. 2011;117(20):5463-5472)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据