4.7 Article

Gene expression profiles predictive of outcome and age in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group study

期刊

BLOOD
卷 119, 期 8, 页码 1872-1881

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-10-382861

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [U01 CA114762, P30 CA118100]
  2. Leukemia&Lymphoma Society Specialized Center of Research [7372-07, 7388-06]
  3. National Cancer Institute (Children's Oncology Group) [U10 CA098543]
  4. Children's Oncology Group Statistical Center [U10 CA98413]
  5. human specimen banking in National Cancer Institute [U24 CA114766]
  6. National Institutes of Health [R01 CA080175]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gene expression profiling was performed on 97 cases of infant ALL from Children's Oncology Group Trial P9407. Statistical modeling of an outcome predictor revealed 3 genes highly predictive of event-free survival (EFS), beyond age and MLL status: FLT3, IRX2, and TACC2. Low FLT3 expression was found in a group of infants with excellent outcome (n = 11; 5-year EFS of 100%), whereas differential expression of IRX2 and TACC2 partitioned the remaining infants into 2 groups with significantly different survivals (5-year EFS of 16% vs 64%; P < .001). When infants with MLL-AFF1 were analyzed separately, a 7-gene classifier was developed that split them into 2 distinct groups with significantly different outcomes (5-year EFS of 20% vs 65%; P < .001). In this classifier, elevated expression of NEGR1 was associated with better EFS, whereas IRX2, EPS8, and TPD52 expression were correlated with worse outcome. This classifier also predicted EFS in an independent infant ALL cohort from the Interfant-99 trial. When evaluating expression profiles as a continuous variable relative to patient age, we further identified striking differences in profiles in infants less than or equal to 90 days of age and those more than 90 days of age. These age-related patterns suggest different mechanisms of leukemogenesis and may underlie the differential outcomes historically seen in these age groups. (Blood. 2012; 119(8):1872-1881)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据